The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The judgment of the court below that convicted a police officer of a mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles that the defendant committed an assault against a police officer even though the defendant did not agree to the passage of a police officer intentionally, while the police officer tried to board the defendant on his body in the course of forcing him to board the ship by force, he was guilty of misconception of facts and misapprehension of legal principles.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (three million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 및 법리오해 원심이 적법하게 조사 및 채택한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 피고인으로부터 폭행당한 경찰관 E은 사건 경위를 묻자 피고인이 욕을 하며 발로 찼다고 수사기관에서 진술하고 있는 점, 목격자 D 역시 피고인이 먼저 경찰관 E에게 욕하며 발길질을 하자 경찰관이 피고인에게 수갑을 채워 경찰차에 태웠다고 수사기관에서 진술하고 있는 점을 종합하여 보면, 피고인이 경찰관 E을 폭행하여 경찰관의 정당한 직무집행을 방해한 것으로 판단되므로, 원심이 이 사건 공소사실을 유죄로 판단한 것은 정당하고, 거기에 사실을 오인하고 법리를 오해하여 판결에 영향을 미친 위법이 없다.

B. Circumstances favorable to the Defendant are that the Defendant is the primary offender of unreasonable sentencing, and that the result of assault was not much serious.

However, considering the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable, even if it is too unreasonable, considering various sentencing conditions such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit.