The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. We examine the judgment on the grounds of appeal, the following facts are recognized as favorable to the defendant: (a) the defendant reflects his mistake while recognizing all the facts constituting the crime of this case; (b) deposited 4 million won for the victim; and (c) it is necessary to consider the possibility of improvement and future social life as a youth of 23 years of age.

However, each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant is not less than the nature of the crime in light of the contents and methods of the crime. The so-called Internet goods transaction fraud is a planned and organized crime against many unspecified and unspecified persons, and social harm is serious and it is necessary to punish the crime. It is also necessary to take over and keep the means of access, which is accompanied thereby. The victim did not reach an agreement or complete recovery from damage up to now, and the victim did not have reached an agreement or complete recovery from damage. The victim was punished for the same crime, not only has the record of being punished for the same crime, but also has committed each of the crimes of this case during the repeated crime due to the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act. The court below seems to have sentenced the punishment by taking full account of the various circumstances of the defendant. The court below seems to have committed the crime of this case in this case in the first instance, there is no special change of circumstances that can reduce the punishment of the court below, balance with the general sentencing in the case of accomplice and the same or similar cases, the defendant's age, character and environment, intelligence, motive and motive and circumstances of this case, possibility of the crime.