The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The gist of the Defendant’s appeal is that the Defendant committed an unlawful act that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts, although the Defendant, at the time of the instant case, carried the cell phone of F in China, carried the shoulder of G in his hands and did not drinking the part of G in his hands, and the Defendant committed an unlawful act that affected the conclusion of the judgment, and the sentence (a punishment (a punishment of imprisonment for August, a suspended sentence of two years, and a community service for 120 hours) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

However, according to the evidence cited by the court below, such as F and G consistent and detailed statements about the circumstances in which the Defendant was damaged at the time of the instant case, the Defendant’s assertion of misunderstanding of facts is without merit, and comprehensively considering various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant case, the Defendant’s punishment declared by the court below is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion of sentencing is without merit.

Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.