logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.07.21 2017고단2226
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name called Seo-gu Btel 405 and 2008 "C" in Seo-gu, Gwangju, and had his female employees employed so that he had sexual intercourse against customers who found the above business establishment.

From March 25, 2017 to March 28, 2017, the Defendant advertised the said commercial entertainment business establishment on the said officetel 405 and 2008’s website “D”. The Defendant reported this to the following: (a) received 11-150,000 won from the name-free customers; (b) directed them to the said heading room; and (c) let female employees, such as Russia E, etc., of the Russian nationality teach customers with sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement in the police interrogation protocol concerning E;

1. Each description of output of Internet publicity, and two copies of contract;

1. Application of each of the video Acts and subordinate statutes to arrested site photographs and red sea cover photographs used in the course of sexual traffic;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense and Article 19 of the Act on the Punishment of such Acts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Additional Collection: Provided, That investigation reports based on recognition (report on the calculation of additional collection charges);

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the primary offense by the defendant, and the scale of mediation of sexual traffic is small.

In addition, the sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow