logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.05.29 2018나320205
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a legal entity that is entrusted by the Minister of Employment and Labor with industrial accident compensation insurance pursuant to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance Act”), and the Defendant A received a request from C Hospital (hereinafter “instant hospital”) and performed repair of double food lifts established in the said hospital (hereinafter “instant lifts”). Defendant B was a person who participated in the repair work of the instant lifts at the request of Defendant A at the request of Defendant A.

B. Around 15:00 on January 19, 2016, D, a management director of the instant hospital, purchased industrial accident compensation insurance pursuant to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, entered the instant premium with Defendant B to verify the repair of the instant premium. In addition, D, as a manager of the instant hospital, he/she suffered injury, such as “alleys, stokes, stoves, and stoves,” by falling the floor of the instant premium.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, entry in Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Although the Plaintiff’s assertion was not completed the repair of the instant lifts, Defendant B solicited Defendant B to board the instant lifts, and the instant accident occurred due to Defendant B’s solicitation on board the instant lifts.

In addition, Defendant A is the prime contractor who was entrusted by the instant hospital with the repair of the instant lifts, and was obligated to perform the repair work, to supervise the repair work, and to take all safety measures therefor, but the instant accident occurred in violation of this, and thus, Defendant A is jointly liable therefor.

Therefore, the Defendants are jointly liable to compensate the Defendants for damages suffered D due to the instant accident. The Plaintiff, among insurance benefits paid to D under the Industrial Accident Insurance Act, 24,245,850 won = active damages part 5,182.

arrow