Defendants publish the summary of the judgment of innocence.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendants are operating a door-to-door seller, a door-to-door seller, in the 3th floor of Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, with a public relations center and office, and “the visiting customers have a food gift through the prescribed resignation and drawing.”

The term "after distributing a leaflet of the content of ", attracting visitors," and attracting customers by means of gambling, seminars, etc., and attracting customers by advertising false or exaggerated facts about products.

Defendant

A From May 11, 2016 to September 12, 2016, he/she takes charge of overall management as the representative of the above N, and from May 2, 2016 to September 12, 2016, Defendant B takes charge of the following duties: (a) the leader of the team in the case of Defendant B; (b) the leader in the case of Defendant C; (c) the 2 team leader in the case of Defendant C; and (d) the 3 team leader in the case of Defendant D; and (c) the 5 team leader in the case of Defendant E, who sells goods to customers; (d) the Defendant F takes charge of the receipt of sales proceeds and the preparation of a copy of the sales place; and (e) the Defendant G takes charge of product publicity as a lecturer.

No one shall indicate or advertise that the name, manufacturing method, quality, nutrition labelling, etc. of foods, etc. has efficacy or effect in preventing and treating diseases, or that such foods, etc. are likely to cause mistake or confusion as medicine or health functional foods.

Nevertheless, the Defendants distributed a leaflet stating that even if they visited as above, they reported and visited them free of charge, and took part in the seminars to encourage interested persons, and did not process them, and did not make a false or exaggerated advertisement as if the raw ginseng dried up on general food had a special efficacy, effect, and effect on health.

On September 3, 2016, the Defendants distributed the leaflets of the above contents at the above public relations center, and Defendant B, Defendant D, and Defendant E reported and visited.