logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.08.23 2013고단2293
상해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,00, and by fine of KRW 3,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. At around 22:10 on April 29, 2013, Defendant B and C inflicted injury on the victim A (Namnam, 39 years of age) and Si expenses due to parking problems in front of the Suwon-gu Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, and Defendant B carried the victim’s spath, spath, face, chest, etc., and Defendant C carried the victim’s spath, spathing spath, spathing the spath, spathing the spath, spathing the spath, spathing the spath, spathing the spath, etc., and walking the part of the spath.

2. Defendant A, at the time, at the time, and at the place of the preceding paragraphs, had the face of the victim C (ma, 42 years of age), B (ma, 41 years of age) and Si expenses attached thereto one time, and had the victim C in one time, with the victim B’s face at one time, with approximately five weeks of treatment, and had the victim C in an injury, such as rain, alshes, alshes, alshes, and alshes the victim B in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and the victim B in an injury, such as the censorship of al

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning photographic images;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fine);

(b) Defendant B and C: Article 2(2) and Article 2(1)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, respectively, of the order of provisional payment;

1. Defendant A: (a) mutually agreed with the victims; (b) the Defendant was the first offender; and (c) the victims appears to have commenced the assault first.

2. Defendant B: A mutually agreed with the victim, and considering the fact that the Defendant had no record of punishment in the last 15 years, etc.

3. Defendant C: Taking into account the fact that there was mutual agreement with the victim and that there was no history exceeding the fine.

arrow