logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2019.01.30 2018고합119
강도상해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above three years against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 22, 2018, around 00:15, the Defendants carried out the card game along with the victim E (ma, 59 years of age), F, and G at the container rest room of Asan City, Inc., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., and Defendant A carried out the card game and betting amounting to 600,000 won, but Defendant A carried out only 3,50,000 won of the money which the victim carried out in the gambling market while having no money separately stored in the solitary money, and carried out the game. Defendant B carried the victim's batf, and Defendant B carried out the game. Defendant B 2-3 times with the victim's fatbat and shouldering the victim's right side with drinking water, Defendant A tried to take up the victim's 0-year batf with the victim's left hand by taking the dangerous things contained in the above water into account the victim's fatfatbat, and Defendant B 4 had the victim's fat at the victim's left hand.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to take property from the victim by carrying dangerous things, and at the same time put about about about 20 days on the left side side of the victim and about 20-day images around the back.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Partial statement of the witness F in the court;

1. Some statements in the police statement of E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. The Defendants asserted that there was a state of mental disability under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant crime.

According to the evidence, it is recognized that the Defendants were under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant crime.

However, in light of the circumstances leading up to the crime of this case, the Defendants, victims, and witnesses’ statements, etc., it seems that the Defendants had the weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to drinking.

arrow