logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.01.14 2019고단4430
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendants are punished by imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes in the 2019 Highest 4430 cases, and each of the crimes in the 2019 Highest 5030, 2019 Highest 5903 cases.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On April 18, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of interference with business, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on February 6, 2019. On March 27, 2019, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced four months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and released as the revocation of detention on June 6, 2019, and completed the execution of the sentence after the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 3, 2019.

[2019 Highest 4430]

1. On July 21, 2019, around 23:05, the Defendant: (a) received a 112 report from Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, “C” in front of “B”; and (b) recommended the Defendant to return home while leaving the Defendant who had a dispute with E in the circumstances of the Seoul Yangyang Police Station D District D District, which was called to the site by the customer at the site after receiving a 112 report stating that “The Defendant was in front of “C”; (c) the Defendant spits spit, etc. on the face of E, while making the Defendant talking that “this sway flap?” in this case.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. On August 22, 2019, at around 23:02, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main business operations for about 10 minutes, such as 10 minutes of alcohol, by entering the main place operated by the victim G (at the age of 59) located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, under the influence of alcohol, and by making the victim drinked by standing on the side of the customer under his/her name unfortunateed that he/she had drinking at that place, and allowing the customer to go out of the main place, and demanding the victim to go out, thereby obstructing the victim’s main business operations.

3. When the victim I (the age of 58) who was the circumstance leading up to the Seoul Yangcheon Police Station D District Unit, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report of 112 on the above date and time, at the above place, recommended the Defendant to leave the main place. While the main place of the business, the customer, etc. hear, the Defendant publicly expressed the victim’s desire to “I will promptly see this spons, I will see it, but I will see it, I will see it.”

arrow