1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s husband’s husband B (hereinafter “the deceased”) is a person employed as a Class 1 driver on January 3, 2003 and worked at the National Institute for Animal and Fisheries Quarantine and Inspection (the name of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry as the Director for Animal, Agriculture and Forestry Quarantine and Inspection on June 15, 201, and the Ministry for Agriculture and Forestry changed on March 23, 2013; hereinafter “the Quarantine and Inspection Headquarters”).

B. On February 3, 2015, the Deceased’s home and the bus was cut to work at around 07:17, and died at around 08:50 on the same day on the same day.

The cause of death in the autopsy report on the deceased is indicated as a brut heart disease.

C. The Plaintiff asserted that the deceased died on official duty or died of a disease on official duty, and claimed compensation for bereaved family members. However, it is difficult to deem that there was an excessive course to the extent that it is medically recognized that the deceased died on May 18, 2015, in light of the deceased’s ordinary duty, details of overtime work, work environment, etc., and it is also difficult to deem that there was an excessive course. In addition, in light of the fact that the deceased was judged to have been judged to have suffered from blood pressure control, call-techer management, and abnormal blood-related symptoms as a result of health examination in 2012 and 2014, the deceased was judged to have been judged to have suffered from severe physical factors, such as geological blood transfusion, as long as he/she was not deceased on the part of his/her official duty, and thus, the deceased’s death caused the death of a cardio

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). D.

The Plaintiff filed a request for review of the instant disposition with the Public Official Pension Benefit Review Committee, but the Review Committee dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for review on May 10, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's entries in Gap's 1 to 3, 7, 9, 10, 11, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is generally divided.