logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.08.22 2014고단985
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a driver of CF rocketing and other vehicles.

On April 16, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle between 00:45, and proceeded at a speed that cannot be seen from the middle school to 107 km from the middle school to the middle school with the front side of the gold-luminous apartment, which is a public road in opticalyang-si.

If he/she had been active, he/she had a duty of care to live well in the front left, and drive safely while accurately manipulating the steering gear, steering system, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led the victim D, who was parked on the left side of the moving direction due to the negligence of driving the vehicle, and received the victim D's Efababababa and the subsequent parts of the vehicle, before the left side of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant had an accident that causes physical damage equivalent to KRW 456,678 on the damaged vehicle due to the above occupational negligence, but failed to take necessary measures even though the witness left the left-hand side of the vehicle and got out of approximately KRW 3M away from the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Related photographs of the traffic accident site;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148 and Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition in view of the following: (a) the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which reflects the instant crime; (b) there is no same kind of power; and (c) the degree of damage appears to be relatively minor.

arrow