All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that each sentence of the lower court against the Defendants (two years of suspended sentence in six months of imprisonment, one year of probation, and 80 hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.

2. The defendants led to the confession and mistake of each of the crimes of this case, the defendants did not have any record of punishment for the same kind of crime, the amount of damage is considerably minor, and the victim's punishment is not imposed against the defendants. However, the circumstances favorable to the defendants. Meanwhile, special larceny is an offense in which the statutory punishment is provided for a period of not less than 1 years and not more than 10 years under Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act. The court below seems to have sentenced the above punishment after considering the above defendants' whole circumstances. The court below's sentencing is reasonable and there are no special circumstances to change the sentence of the court below, and considering the defendants' age, character, intelligence and environment, motive and background of the crime, method, method, result, criminal records before and after the crime, there are no circumstances to change the sentence of the court below. Thus, each of the above defendants' arguments against the above defendants are not acceptable.

3. As such, the Defendants’ respective appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since they are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.