A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidenting Measures) are those engaged in driving BM5 vehicles;

On October 21, 2012, at around 23:05, the Defendant driven the said car with a alcohol content of 0.182% 0.10% and driven it along the window in the city of Changwon-si, Changnam, the Defendant continued to drive the said car along the intersection of the window of the window of the city of Changwon-si along the speed of about 30km from the Do square to the Do road office at the speed of about 30km in speed.

The location is where the vehicle signal, etc. is installed, and in such cases, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to live well on the front side and the left and right of the driver of the vehicle and to drive the vehicle safely according to the vehicle progress signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the victim C (the 51-year-old driver) who was in the atmosphere of the signal signal due to the negligence of the Defendant, to be the front part of the car driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim E (the aged 23) and the victim F (the aged 24) who was on board the said taxi due to an influence in the treatment days, etc., and suffered injury to the climatic salt, etc., which requires approximately two-day medical treatment, respectively, on the part of the victim E (the passengers on board the said taxi) and the victim F (the aged 24). At the same time, the Defendant, while destroying the repair cost of the said taxi to the number of 309,184 won, immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

2. On the date and time set forth in Paragraph 1, the Defendant driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.182% at a distance of about 40km from the front day to the point of accident as set forth in Paragraph 1, of the trade name, “Drun” in the movement of Gyeongyang-nam-si at the border.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police with C 1.