beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2016 Highest 406"
1. Fraud against the victim C;
A. A. On August 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around August 19, 2013, the Defendant: (b) around August 19, 2013, the Defendant: (c) on the victim, who was close to one another, called “allace,” and was unable to purchase the vehicle under his/her own name; and (d) was granted a loan of KRW 7.6 million for the purchase cost of a heavy freight vehicle in his/her name; and (c) on the other hand, the Defendant paid the loan in the amount of KRW 270,500 per month for 36 months.
1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”
However, at the time of fact, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to repay the loan even if he borrowed 7.6 million won to the victim's name, because the financial situation was very poor to the extent that he could not properly prepare the living expenses such as monthly rent.
Nevertheless, the Defendant had the victim obtain an installment loan of KRW 7.6 million from the KB Capital Office located in Changwon-si on the same day, and purchased D Poter Cargo Vehicles with the loan.
Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained 7.6 million won pecuniary benefits.
B. On September 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around September 27, 2013, around September 27, 2013, leased and used construction materials, such as cryp, from F, to the victim (i) around September 27, 2013.
It is necessary to pay all the construction materials rent on the face of the week as joint guarantor, and to refund the materials after the use of the materials is completed.
1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”
However, at the time of fact, the Defendant was entering into a subcontract for the structural construction of G multi-household housing in 2008. However, since around 2008, the Defendant was under a subcontract for the structural construction of the said G multi-household housing, there was a large amount of wage and material purchase cost to be paid by the enemy for each structural construction that had been subcontracted from around 2008. In order to provide money, the Defendant was under a subcontract for the structural construction of the said G multi-household housing.