logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.11.25 2015고단2679
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and for six months, respectively.

However, from the date when this judgment has become final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around April 26, 2013, Defendant A made a false statement to the effect that “A Kaf, the name of which is unknown” located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, died due to a traffic accident, and the sum of the insurance proceeds and the agreed amount was paid to Mafa and paid to Mafa in total to Mafa. The Defendant is managing the said money as his guardian. However, the head of the Tong-gu was seized, but the expenses for the termination of seizure are required. If the Defendant lent KRW 10 million, he would repay the money after 15 days.”

However, in fact, there was no dualization of G, and there was no insurance money paid to it.

In addition, while the Defendant did not have any special property or monthly income, G, the husband of the Defendant, was in bad credit standing because he was unable to repay the bank loans.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and receiving KRW 10 million on the same day from November 22, 2013, received 12 times a sum of KRW 68 million, as shown in the attached Table (A) from the time of the victim test, from November 22, 2013.

2. Around July 4, 2013, Defendant B made a false statement to the effect that “Around July 4, 2013, the Defendant was “a mother in which the name is unknown” located in the Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, U.S. and the husband operates the excavated company. The husband is in need of funds for the excavation. It is necessary to lend money. It shall be repaid two months after lending money.”

However, the defendant did not have any special property or monthly income, while he did not have any obligation to pay 500 million won in the name of the defendant's husband, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to pay it.

As above, the Defendant, as well as the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and receiving KRW 32 million on the same day from February 24, 2014, received the total of KRW 53 million from that time until February 24, 2014, as shown in the List of Crimes (B).

arrow