logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.11.02 2018고단2627
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On August 21, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million by the Ulsan District Court for a crime of violation of road traffic law (drinking) and a violation of road traffic law (licensed driving) and a fine of KRW 2 million by the same court on August 24, 2016.

【The Defendant driven a B rocketing car under the influence of alcohol content 0.098% from around August 29, 2018, 2018 to around the 5km section from the front of the Hodong-dong, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, Ulsan-dong, to the front road of the same Jung-gu, Seodong-dong, and the front road of the middle school.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the duty not to drive alcohol more than twice, was driving under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement report on the circumstances of a driver who is placed in driving, report on the circumstances of a driver who is placed in driving, and inquiry into the results of regulating drinking;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (report on the same kind of force);

1. Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the selection of a fine, and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order does not significantly increase the amount of alcohol concentration among the blood for the reason of sentencing. In addition to the criminal records as indicated in the judgment, the sentence of a fine of one time due to a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act of 2014 and the defendant reflects the error.

arrow