beta
Text
1. Defendant C indicated in the attached Form No. 1, 2, 7, 8, 8, and 174.5m2 on the first floor of the building indicated in the attached Table No. 174.55m to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).
Reasons
A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed a principal lawsuit and counterclaim.
1. The plaintiff and defendant B's respective claims
A. The facts following the facts do not conflict between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, or may be recognized by comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4, and 5, and Eul evidence No. 9 and the entire purport of the pleadings.
1) On May 30, 2008, the Plaintiff’s building indicated in the separate sheet, which is a commercial building owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant building”).
) Of the second floor, 174.55m2 was leased to Defendant B for the lease deposit of KRW 20,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 1,300,000, and the lease period of KRW 5,000 from June 5, 2008 to June 4, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as “the lease of this case”).
(2) The Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to pay to the Plaintiff the electricity charges, water supply and sewerage charges, environmental charges, and cleaning expenses for septic tanks, etc. regarding the leased portion from the instant lease agreement to the Plaintiff by June 5, 2008.
3) While the instant lease was implicitly renewed each year on or around February 11, 2011, the Plaintiff notified Defendant B of the delivery of the instant lease object by the beginning of May 201, but even thereafter, Defendant B paid monthly rent and continued to use the leased object until February 4, 2014. The Plaintiff and Defendant B agreed that the instant lease was terminated on March 13, 2014, and accordingly, Defendant B removed the leased object from the first place on March 13, 2014, and the Plaintiff requested Defendant B to provide KRW 20,000,000, KRW 20,000,000, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 200.
5) On November 16, 2014, Defendant B delivered the leased portion to the Plaintiff. (b) The Plaintiff asserted and decided on November 16, 2014. (1) The termination of the lease of this case was implicitly renewed on a one-year basis even after the expiration of the agreed lease term, and Defendant B removed from the office of March 2014.