The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (the imprisonment of eight months) is too unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). In the first instance court, there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the lower court’s failure to submit new data on sentencing in the trial, and the circumstances alleged by the Defendant for unfair reasons for sentencing are deemed to have already been reflected in the lower court’s sentencing grounds. The Defendant was detained at the request for revoking the suspended sentence on August 11, 2017 because the Defendant committed the larceny of the same law again during the period of the suspended sentence due to the larceny of the same law, and was released on August 11, 2017, and thus, there was a high possibility of criticism for the Defendant as well as the victims and victims, no damage was inflicted, and there were no reasonable grounds to view the motive for reimbursement and other reasonable circumstances beyond the scope of sentencing.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.