A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 24, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Southern District Court for the crime of interference with business, etc. on April 20, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence in the original prison.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On June 5, 2013, around 11:50 on June 5, 2013, the Defendant damaged the damage of property by putting 6,000 won in the floor the victim’s market value, which is the victim’s holding on the table, and 2,000 won in total, of the market value on the table, on the floor, on the ground that the victim was able to drink alcohol at the Eda room operated by Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul), but the victim was able not to drink alcohol without giving her knowledge of the drinking value.

2. Interference with business;

A. On April 28, 2013, from around 17:50 to 18:10 on the same day, the Defendant demanded that the victim’s HF located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government request the treatment expenses of the face face room arising out of the two injury cases that occurred between the Defendant and the victim before towing the victim, and interfered with the victim’s drinking business by force by avoiding the disturbance, such as “Chewing years, bitbit of bitbit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a

B. On June 5, 2013, from around 11:50 to 12:20 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim D’s multiple business operations by force by preventing customers, who were entering the relevant multiplescam from entering the Ecamscams as referred to in the foregoing paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of D or G;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports (report on confirmation of repeated crimes, etc.);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Imprisonment) - Interference with business, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, concerning facts constituting an offense - Loss of or damage to property;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes: