A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 07 .24. 20:00 경부터 같은 날 22:20 경까지 사이에 부산 부산진구 B에 있는 피해자 C 운영의 ‘D 주점 ’에서 피해자에게 “ 씹할 년 아, 대가리 확 뿌순다, 죽인다 ”라고 욕설을 하며 소리를 지르다가 옆에 있던 다른 손님이 이를 제지하자 “ 개 자슥아, 확 죽이 뿌까 ”라고 위협을 하여 손님 중 일부가 가게 밖으로 나가게 하는 등 약 2시간 동안 위력으로 피해자의 식당 영업을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. The relevant law and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts and the grounds for sentencing [the scope of recommending punishment] [the grounds for sentencing [the scope of recommending punishment] under Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, the basic field (from June to one year and six months] (no person subject to special sentencing] (a decision subject to sentencing] of the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence for eight months for whom he/she had been sentenced to a suspended sentence for eight months due to interference with business in the branch court of the Daegu District Court on April 26, 2017.

5. 5. The fact that the instant crime was committed again during the period of suspension of execution, which became final and conclusive by the judgment, is disadvantageous.

In addition, in full view of the circumstances that are conditions for sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the background, means and methods of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the age of the defendant, sexual conduct and environment, etc., and the records and arguments of this case, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.