logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2021.01.20 2020고단1741
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized evidence No. 1 (Dog) shall be returned to the victim B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On May 12, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended execution as a result of interference with business in the Seo-gu District Court's Branch Branch Office of the Daegu District Court on May 12, 2020, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 20,

[Criminal facts]

1. On January 23, 2020, the Defendant stolen 13,000 won of the market price, which is the victim’s possession, displayed at the victim B, located in Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, with 18:23 around D management of the victim B.

2. Special intimidation: (a) the Defendant: (b) was in the display stand prior to the 1stm of the victim FF in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu (90cm in total length, 20cm in width, 20cm in length, 8cm in length) in front of the said self-denunciation; and (c) the Defendant reported that the frh of Ams reported.

The head of the Do shall be omitted.

The payment shall be discarded by affixing the interest rate.

"....." If the injured person reported the Defendant to the police or acted to build the core of the Defendant, he/she threatened the victim as if he/she would inflict any harm on the body of the injured person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to B or F;

1. Each investigation report (the sequence 19,22 of the evidence list);

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Each photograph (the list Nos. 6, 20, 21), receipt;

1. Criminal records as stated in the judgment: A response to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation report (verification of criminal records of the same kind), report on the results of confirmation of the previous conviction before disposition (Evidence No. 29), output of summary information inquiry of the case, and application of the text of the judgment to statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 333(1) of the Return Criminal Procedure Act has a record of criminal punishment for multiple times of violence.

arrow