The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment is publicly announced.

1. Defendant A is the former bridge of “G”, Defendant B is the head of “G” with the interest of the former president of H Foundation in Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “H Foundation”). Defendant C is prior to the interest of the head of “G” and Defendant D is prior to I.

“G” is an unincorporated association that performs functions such as preserving and providing services for literature and seedlings in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and Yangcheon-gu regions. Pursuant to Article 3(1) of the H Property Act, the “H Foundation” is a foundation established to maintain literature and seedlings in Seoul Metropolitan Government and to promote the promotion and cultural development of inducement by operating educational and educational projects, and has been constantly controversial between G and H foundations due to issues related to the qualification of the victim J elected by the president of H Foundation and the legality of the election process. In that process, the “K”, who is a non-standing member of the G, was issued a disposition to recommend the victim’s qualification as a forest member.

1. On December 20, 2014, from around 10:30 to 12:10 on December 20, 2014, Defendant A refers to the victim who is gathered in order to attend the victim’s H foundation appointment event in front of the G entrance in Seoul L, and among approximately three persons, such as the forest members and the primary customers, the victim is not the victim, and “J has been expelled from G, thereby restricting H access.

J has sent forged documents to the court

“A document forgery need not be carried into H” and “a document forgery need not be carried into H.

Shescopia Hascop Hascop Hascop Hascop

“This person (J) may not be defamation, but was sentenced 2 years of suspended execution and 80 hours of community service order by the Supreme Court on November 28, 2013 to 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for an act of false accusation.

“The victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out facts by talking about “,” etc.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1), has been gathered in order to participate in a victim’s H foundation appointment event at the victim’s H foundation, and there are approximately several persons, such as a forest member and a sentry guest.