1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,000,000 and its related amount are 5% per annum from August 13, 2013 to May 23, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

In full view of the contents of evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including additional numbers) and the fact-finding results with respect to the Korean Bar Association of this Court, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for attorney-at-law appointment with the Defendant for criminal cases around September 28, 2009, and paid the Defendant KRW 3 million in total at the rate of KRW 1.5 million on Oct. 13, 2009, and KRW 3 million on Oct. 23, 2010. The Defendant received an application for disciplinary action from the Korean Bar Association of Korea on December 28, 2010 on the ground that he/she did not faithfully perform his/her duty as attorney-at-law, such as submission of the Plaintiff’s written appointment of counsel at the investigation agency or the court, and the fact-finding with respect to this case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s 20% from the Plaintiff’s case’s case’s case’s case’s damages.

If so, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.