The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. From March 2012 to December 28, 2012, the Defendant, at the Seongdong-gu Seoul Company B’s office, acquired 20 illegal reproduction of the said company’s copyright from March 2012 to December 28, 2012, at the 7th business-use computer installed there, the Defendant infringed the copyright of said copyright holder by acquiring 7 of the “Office 2007 Eterprise”, 1 of the “Office 2007 Eterprise”, 6 of the “AutioCAD 2011” with the copyright, 6 of the “Korea-do 2007” with the copyright, and using the said company’s copyright for business purposes.

2. The facts charged of this case fall under Articles 136(2)4 and 124(1)3 of the Copyright Act and can be prosecuted only upon a victim’s complaint pursuant to the main sentence of Article 140 of the Copyright Act. According to the records of the letter of withdrawal of complaint filed in the records, it can be acknowledged that C withdraws the Defendant’s complaint on December 21, 2012, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.