1. The Defendant’s KRW 62,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from April 9, 2017 to September 6, 2018, and the following.

(b). b.

On April 3, 2014, the Defendant decided to sell the hotel of this case and its site to F, G, H, and I (hereinafter “Buyers”), which is the People’s Republic of China, for KRW 4.2 billion, and the price was paid KRW 600 million when the contract was concluded, KRW 400 million at the time of the commencement of the contract and the transfer of the ownership of the land, KRW 600 million at the time of the completion of the aggregate construction of the first and second floors, KRW 60 million at the time of the completion of the aggregate construction, and KRW 2 billion at the time of the change of the owner’s name after completion of the construction.

C. On June 25, 2014, the Defendant delegated the following matters concerning the construction of the instant hotel (hereinafter “instant delegation agreement”) to the Plaintiff, a certified architect, who was in charge of the design services of the instant hotel, as well as the Plaintiff, who was an architect of the instant hotel, with the authority to supervise the new hotel construction site management of the instant hotel on June 1, 201.

2. Authority to receive the sales price and to manage the passbook for new hotel construction works of this case.

3. The right to construct the hotel of this case and to pay the contract price for the hotel construction project of this case* All the above rights shall lapse after the completion of the hotel of this case and all the payment of the contract price related to the construction work of this case and the delivery

The work was comprehensively delegated. D.

On June 13, 2014, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on the instant hotel site on June 13, 2014 to buyers, and the change of the name of the owner of the instant hotel on October 29, 2015.

E. Around December 2015, the Plaintiff completed the instant hotel, and on December 28, 2015, the Seogpo City approved the use of the instant hotel.

The hotel of this case was completed on March 16, 2016 and registered the preservation of ownership was completed.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 8, 12-16, 19-23, Eul 1-13, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1 is the Plaintiff’s service cost of KRW 5 million per month from May, 2014 to December 2015 and the hotel of this case.