1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to A Lastren Vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), the Defendant is the owner of B bus (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) and the Defendant’s assistant intervenor is the insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant vehicle.

B. On May 23, 2014, at around 06:45, the Defendant’s vehicle moved to a four-lane (including a one-way one-way one-way one-way one) in the vicinity of the decline in Southyang-si, the two-lanes, depending on the two-lanes, into the bank’s three-lanes in the private labor room in the Gurisi, and began to look at the above-lane where the U.S. is not allowed for the U.S. to reach the crosswalk immediately before the above outward distance. On the back of the Defendant’s bus, the Plaintiff’s vehicle going to the one-lane (main machine) after discovering the Defendant’s vehicle and went to the other, but from the two-lane of the opposite lane, the front door of the Plaintiff’s vehicle was shocked by the front door part of the driver’s seat of the Defendant’s front driver.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

On June 10, 2014, the Plaintiff paid insurance proceeds of KRW 2,501,100 at the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 4, or the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the above facts, the accident of this case was caused by the unilateral negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle who tried to make a U-turn in the two-lanes where U.S. is prohibited, so the defendant is liable to pay to the plaintiff the amount equivalent to the above insurance money of KRW 2,501,100 and the delay damages.

B. As to this, the defendant's vehicle was ordinarily driven by the defendant's vehicle at a one-lane, but the plaintiff's vehicle driving one-lane depending on the defendant's vehicle was forced to turn to the left while entering the opposite lane beyond the median line.