logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.06.10 2014나2038850
약정금
Text

1. The judgment of the first instance court, including a claim that has been changed in exchange at the trial, shall be modified as follows:

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Status 1 of the parties to the same speech and development company (hereinafter “Dong speech and development”).

When indicating a person related to the case who is a stock company, "stock company" shall be omitted.

) The Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government urban environment rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”) shall be conducted by constructing and selling the 6th underground and 22th ground-based business and sales facilities in the Bupyeong-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul.

The Si Corporation is the gold-free industry.

(2) A company is the company with which it was in force. (2) ① the Plaintiff, ② Defendant Masmon Savings Bank, ③ Defendant Esp Savings Bank (hereinafter “Masp Savings Bank,” “Masp Savings Bank,” “Masp Savings Bank,” and “Esp Savings Bank,” respectively changed to the current trade name as of December 23, 2013), ④ Defendant Espon Savings Bank (the trade name was changed to the current trade name as of March 26, 2012, respectively) (the name was changed to the current trade name on March 26, 2012), ⑤ Korea Espon Savings Bank (hereinafter “Maspon Savings Bank,” and “Maspon Savings Bank,” respectively changed to the current trade name as of November 26, 2012), and ④ Defendant Espon Savings Bank (hereinafter “Private Savings Bank, Aug. 26, 2010”).

16 banks, which entered into the instant joint loan agreement as described in the subsection, are six banks.

3) On October 21, 2014, the Maritime Savings Bank was declared bankrupt by Busan District Court 2014Hahap1002, and the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation was appointed as trustee in bankruptcy, and the Plaintiff’s Maritime Savings Bank taken over the lawsuit against the Plaintiff’s Maritime Savings Bank in the trial at the trial. (B) The Plaintiff and the Defendant Pudong Mutual Savings Bank, the Defendant Pudong Savings Bank, the Defendant Emb Savings Bank, the Defendant Emb Savings Bank, the Maritime Savings Bank, and the Defendant Non-Governmental Savings Bank (hereinafter “Defendant Pudong Mutual Savings Bank”), including the Defendant Pudong Savings Bank, the Defendant Es Savings Bank, the Defendant Es Savings Bank, the Defendant Es Savings Bank, the Maritime Savings Bank, the Defendant Maritime Savings Bank, and the Defendant Maritime Savings Bank, respectively, constituted a lender on the basis of the intermediation of secondary securities, and around May 7, 2008.

arrow