The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (four years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below reveals that all of the crimes of this case were led to confession and rebuttal, and that the defendant voluntarily led to confession of the remaining crimes of the crime No. 6 of the crime list in the annexed Table No. 5 of the judgment of the court below while being arrested and investigated by the defendant, and some crimes were committed, and the victim E expressed his intention not to be punished against the defendant during the investigation, and submitted an additional agreement to the same effect in the trial. The judgment of the court below is considered as favorable to the defendant. All of the charges except cash out of the damaged money and valuables were sentenced to return to the victim.

However, the defendant was sentenced to two years and six months on March 25, 201 due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, which was sentenced to imprisonment on March 25, 201, and the execution of the sentence was completed on July 21, 2013, and even before three months have passed, the crime of this case began by using several methods used at the time of the crime of this case. The amount of damage caused by the crime of this case was not much small, and the victim was sentenced to the return of some damage as seen above, and even if the victim was sentenced to the return of the damage, the victim's name-based victim did not have a substantial meaning as the recovery of damage, and even until now, the victim's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, circumstances such as sentencing conditions after the crime of this case, and all of the recommended sentencing guidelines set forth by the sentencing guidelines by the sentencing committee for six years or more.