1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with respect to the A-si (hereinafter “Plaintiff-si”), and the Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with respect to B-si (hereinafter

B. On February 12, 2014, around 08:30, the Plaintiff taxi and Defendant taxi, who driven front roads of the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Seodaemun-gu fire fighting center, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, with the front roads located in the jurisdiction of the Seodaemun-gu Office located in the boundary of the parallel intersection, caused a shock between Plaintiff taxi and Defendant taxi.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). C.

On April 29, 2014, the Plaintiff paid insurance proceeds of KRW 2,692,00 at the cost of repairing the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry or video of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3 through 6, and purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff asserted and determined that the accident of this case is an accident where the plaintiff taxi, who was proceeding on the right side of the plaintiff taxi while normally proceeding in accordance with the direct route in front of the front bank, tried to drive the plaintiff taxi with the shocking of the plaintiff taxi, and thus, the plaintiff alleged that the plaintiff's unilateral negligence was caused by the plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's claim for the full amount of the insurance money paid to the defendant as compensation. The defendant claimed that the accident of this case is that the plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff'

In addition to the overall purport of the pleadings on the statements or images of evidence Nos. 8 and 9, the defendant taxi, who was driven by the plaintiff taxi in front of the plaintiff taxi, changed the crosswalk into a two-lane, along the two-lanes, and returned to the left-hand side of the plaintiff taxi, and entered the first-lane to the left-hand side of the plaintiff taxi, when the defendant taxi, who was driven by the plaintiff taxi in front of the plaintiff taxi, changed to a two-lane.