logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2019.10.10 2019고단230
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 2, 2018, the Defendant driven a B B body-man car on November 2, 2018, driving 530 short-term distance from the west at the city of the prime city to the distance of unification.

At that time, the car of the victim C(the age of 46) was stopped in the signal atmosphere, and therefore, the driver of the vehicle was obliged to prevent the accident in advance by accurately operating the brake and steering gear and stopping after the above Abeo car.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, and received the rear part of the said Abea car as the front part of the said Abea car by negligence.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, committed an injury to the victim C, such as salt, tensions, etc. of a horse requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and sustained injury to the victim E (here, 43 years old) who was on the said Abea car, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about three weeks, and attempted to stop the said Abea car without taking measures such as aiding the victims, even though it damages the said 361,020 won for repair costs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C Witness’s testimony;

1. Each police statement of E;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Each written diagnosis and medical examination and treatment (E);

1. Written estimate of damaged vehicles;

1. An accident site photograph;

1. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of this case, the defendant confirmed part of the damage inflicted on the motor vehicle immediately after the traffic accident in this case. However, the victim did not inform the insurance company, etc. of contact information while communicating to the insurance company, etc. for dealing with the accident and did not speak.

arrow