logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.08.28 2018고단979
약사법위반등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months;

2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. He may not establish a pharmacy, other than Defendant A and Defendant B’s co-principal or herb pharmacist;

Nevertheless, the Defendants: (a) prepared a pharmacy operated by Defendant A, not a pharmacist; (b) filed an application for the establishment of a pharmacy; (c) opened a bank account in their own name; and (d) decided that Defendant A would prepare drugs at the pharmacy operated by Defendant A, and receive monthly pay of KRW 3 million; and (c) conspired for the establishment of a pharmacy by forming the appearance of Defendant A, rather than a pharmacist, even though Defendant A was actually opening and operating a pharmacy.

According to the Defendants’ above public offering from June 20, 2016 to May 15, 2017, at G pharmacy located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Defendant A was in charge of overall operation of a pharmacy, such as placing an order for the preparation of a pharmacy, paying medicines, employing employees, selling over-the-counter drugs, and managing funds. Defendant B directly prepared drugs after receiving KRW 3 million monthly wage from June 20, 2016 to September 2016. From September 20, 2016 to May 15, 2017, Defendant B established the above pharmacy by having H, who received KRW 3 million per month wage, prepare drugs.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to establish a pharmacy in violation of the prohibition of establishing a pharmacy by a person other than a pharmacist.

2. He may not establish a pharmacy, other than a pharmacist or herb pharmacist of common criminal acts of Defendant A or Defendant C.

Nevertheless, the Defendants, who are not pharmacists, decided to establish a pharmacy by employing another pharmacist in order to increase the cost of Defendant A, who is not a pharmacist, while running a G pharmacy as described in paragraph (1), by failing to work at the pharmacy. Defendant C, a pharmacist, applied for the establishment of a pharmacy and applied for the establishment of a pharmacy.

arrow