A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 00:41 on July 2, 2016, at the “C Hospital Emergency Service Center in Kimcheon-si B, Kimcheon-si, the Defendant, upon receiving 112 reports on the 112 fact that the Defendant was seated, solicited the Defendant to return home from four police officers, such as the police officer E, etc., belonging to the police officer of the Kimcheon-si Police Station D police box called, “Serop, Hafe, Hafe, Haf, Haf, Hafh, Hafh, Hafhh, Hafhh, Hafhh, Hafhh, Hafhhh. Hafhhhh, Hafhhhhh, Hafhhhhh, Hafhhhhhhh, by threatening the said police officer to go aboard the patrol vehicle to stop driving the patrol vehicle.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and patrol affairs by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (referring to reports on internal investigation (referring to reports made by police officers accompanying the police officers' statements) and investigation reports (referring to statements made by police officers accompanying the visit);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. One month to five years from the date of imprisonment with prison labor for a prison labor in law; and

2. Application of the sentencing criteria [Determination of the type of the obstruction of the performance of official duties] Category I (Compulsory Obstruction of the Performance of Official Duties) (Scope of Recommendation Punishment] Imprisonment with prison labor for six months from June to April (Basic Area).

3. The details of the crime are not good, such as lying the police officer who is lawfully performing the official duty and lying it on the police vehicle.

However, the defendant seems to have been under the influence of alcohol at the time, the fact that the defendant did not exercise direct violence against the police officer's body, and that there are many criminal records, but there are no criminal records exceeding the obstruction of performance of official duties or fine, and the defendant's other crimes.