A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle in the CM5 vehicle.

On March 11, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.126% during blood transfusions on March 11, 2017, and 2474 Do 2474 Do Do Do 2474 Do Do Do Do Do 2474 Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do do Do do do do

Since there is a place where traffic control is carried out, there was a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving service should proceed in accordance with the name and body of the person engaged in driving service, and to properly manipulate the steering system and the steering system, thereby preventing accidents.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was found to have received the front part of the car of the victim EM5 car driving car, which was left left to the left from the front side of the upper north by negligence, even though the electric traffic signal was under the influence of alcohol, from the front part of the car of the CM5 car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence such as approximately 4, 5-day cage cages, etc., which require approximately 7 weeks of medical treatment to victims D, and the victim F, the victim F, the victim F, the victim f, the right frame, 4-day cages, etc., and the victim G, the passenger of the above CM5, the passenger car driver of the above CM5, for approximately 17-day medical treatment.

2. On March 11, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with 0.126% alcohol concentration in blood from the section of about 40km from the 113-km-si, Yangyang-si, Yangyang-si, Yangsan-si, and from the 2474-do, Yangsan-si to the front three-distance of the Private Education and Training Institute, the Defendant driven the said CM5-car under the influence of alcohol concentration at about 0.126%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. The circumstantial statement of the driver involved and response to a request for appraisal;

1.Each.