logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2017.06.02 2017고단258
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 15, 2017, at around 17:15, the Defendant received a 112 report from a police officer belonging to the Chungcheong Police Station B, who was dispatched to the site and received a demand for the measurement of drinking alcohol from C to a police officer belonging to the Chungcheong Police Station B, who was dispatched to the site on the front side of the Statistics Korea's office located in 271, as the name of the order of guidance at around 17:15, 201, and refused it; and “nicking shots”; and “nicks are police;

Before having taken a bath to “Iskh’s son,” the Defendant continued to arrest the left part of the above C on one occasion by police officers, and assaulted C’s son’s son’s son in the course of carrying out the patrol.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the crackdown on driving of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. Each written statement E and C;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;

1. Photographs (victims, etc. damaged by police officers);

1. A report on internal investigation accompanied by records (a detailed statement of the processing of reported cases);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of a copy of the ledger using a drinking measuring instrument, and attach B CCTV images voluntarily submitted by a damaged police officer);

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to criminal facts and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment (the obstruction of the performance of official duties, the selection of fines, the crime of this case requires a police officer who conducts the duty of drinking control to give a serious desire to the police officer who conducts the duty of drinking control, the face of the crime of this case was calculated once, and the crime of this case was conducted three times for a police officer after the arrest. Since the nature of the crime was poor in light of the method of crime, etc., and even after the arrest, there was no effort to receive

However, the Defendant made a confession of all of the instant crimes and reflects their depth, and the Defendant is in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act in 2001, with the exception of a fine of KRW 1 million, a fine of KRW 700,000,000, and a fine of KRW 1.5 million due to the crime of injury in 2002.

arrow