logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.05.26 2017고정64
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is committing the same act as C (the suspension of indictment on January 6, 2017).

On 09. 09. 01:00 on 09. 09. 01:0, the Defendant told F (25 years of age) of the victim F (hereinafter referred to as “heat”) on the street in front of the E main store located in Heung-gu, Soung-gu, Cheongju-gu, Cheongdong-gu, with his face unfolded, and the Defendant took the face of the victim. The Defendant continued to take the victim’s face back by drinking up the victim’s face, and continued to go up the victim’s face up against it, and went up the victim’s face up to the victim, thereby leaving the victim’s face.

Therefore, the defendant, in collaboration with C, inflicted bodily injury on the part of the victim, such as the 42-day subargument and other subargument that requires medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A protocol concerning partial examination of suspect with regard to C;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 2 (2) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. for Criminal Facts, Article 2 of the Act on the Selection of Punishment of Violences, etc., Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. As to the Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the Defendant asserted that the Defendant solely inflicted an injury on the victim, and that there was no injury on the part of the victim, jointly with C, and that there was no injury on the part of the victim. Thus, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, while the Defendant was in time with the victim at the time of the instant case, the Defendant was able to take the face of the victim, and the Defendant was shot up on the body of the victim by going beyond the Defendant due to its defense against the victim, and the Defendant’s act, the Defendant’s act, “When harming her internal organ”

“In doing so, the victim’s head knife with the victim’s head knife and remove each other; the defendant knife almost the victim’s face in a state of knife; C head knife at the time.

arrow