1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On November 15, 2010, the Plaintiff’s son B (hereinafter “the deceased”) was admitted to the Gun, and served as a volunteer in the first group of the 71st group of the first group of the Marine Corps and the second group of the 71st group to the second class of the 71st group of the Marine Corps, and committed suicide at a private bath among the headquarters on July 10, 201.

On January 13, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration as a bereaved family member of a person who has rendered distinguished service to the State, alleging that the deceased constitutes a person who has rendered distinguished service to the State, and the Defendant rendered a decision on April 23, 2014 that the deceased’s death by self-injury as a direct cause of the assault, quality, intimidation, duty burden, etc. of senior soldiers in relation to military duties or education and training, and that the deceased fell under the requirements of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State (hereinafter “the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc.”) without falling under the requirements of the Act on the Support

On November 24, 2014, the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission recommended the Minister of National Defense to review the deceased’s death as suicide, and the Minister of National Defense, upon review by the Central Major Death Review Committee, deemed the deceased to have died as self-injury with a considerable educational training or education and training, and decided to divide the deceased’s death as his/her death on duty.

On January 14, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of bereaved family members of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State by asserting that he/she falls under the category of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State under the Act on Persons of Distinguished Services to the State. On May 16, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision to reject the Plaintiff’s application for registration of bereaved family members of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Grounds for recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 5, and