A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the “C” restaurant located in Changwon-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si B; (b) received a report from the above 112 proprietor of the restaurant; and (c) received a report from E on September 2, 2018, whether the Defendant “a assaulted” was committed by E in the circumstances in which the D

“In response to the question, assaulted on the part of E at one occasion per own drinking.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is poor, considering the fact that the defendant has no past record of a serious crime, details of the case, degree of assault, etc.