The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

judgment of the first instance.

The reason why our court's explanation about this case is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The plaintiff argues that the disposition of this case was unlawful as it deviates from the scope of discretion or abused discretion. However, even if the plaintiff's whole evidence, including Gap evidence Nos. 19, 20, and Gap evidence No. 21-1, and No. 21-2, submitted in the trial, it is not sufficient to recognize that the disadvantage suffered by the plaintiff is significantly serious than the public interest to be achieved through the disposition of this case, and even considering all the circumstances alleged by the plaintiff, the plaintiff's appeal of this case cannot be deemed to be an abuse of discretion.) has no reason to dismiss the plaintiff's appeal, and the costs of appeal are fully borne by the plaintiff who has lost.