The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant recognized the instant crime and took part in the instant vehicle, and disposed of the instant vehicle.

This is the circumstances favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant two times or more throughout the framework, and the nature of the crime is not good.

The defendant has already been subject to four times or punishment due to drinking driving from the year 2012, there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and where the first instance judgment does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). There is no new change in circumstances that could change the sentence of the lower court in the trial.

This is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In full view of such circumstances as well as the Defendant’s age, environment, sexual conduct, motive for committing a crime, and circumstances before and after committing a crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.