logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.02.19 2019고단5548
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 15, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million by the Suwon District Court for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

At around 21:40 on December 20, 2019, the Defendant driven a d SM5 car with approximately KRW 500 meters from the front day of the mutually unfluent restaurant in the vicinity of the black tin distance in Gwangju Mine-gu to the front day of the Gu C in the same Gu, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.075%.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Making a report on the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, etc., inquiry reports, investigation reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a copy of summary order;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (Selection of Fine)

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that a defendant was punished by a fine for a drunk driving in 2015, and the reason for his/her drunk driving did not have any special circumstances to be taken into account. However, if the defendant excluded the above punishment power, he/she does not have any criminal history, and the blood alcohol concentration (075%) was relatively high, and the distance of his/her drunk driving (500 meters) was not relatively high, and the punishment shall be imposed by a fine in comprehensive consideration of the sentencing conditions prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and conditions after the crime.

arrow