logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.03.18 2014가단159733
부당이득금반환
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant Creta Services Co., Ltd.: (a) KRW 14.4 million and its amount from November 9, 2014; and (b) Defendant.

Reasons

1. On July 7, 2014, the nominal account number transfer amount of 10029505050586 7.2 million won in Hana Bank 654902069704704 July 7, 2014, which was the nominal account holder, obtained the Plaintiff’s name bank No. 740902714,500,000 won and the Plaintiff’s name bank No. 74090,50714,730,000 won, and the Plaintiff’s name bank No. 74090,3089,000 won and No. 73089,000 won, and the Plaintiff’s name bank No. 66 million won and No. 7481,7848,000 won, which was the Plaintiff’s new account No. 97484, Jul. 8, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] The entry of Evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The part on the claim against Defendant Creta Services, Ra community options, Gabble Co., Ltd., Ltd. and B

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(b) 1) Defendant Crta Service, Company B, and Service by Publication (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act)

3. Part of the claim against the defendant C

A. 1) The Plaintiff’s primary claim is determined as follows: (a) the Plaintiff, as seen earlier, remitted money to the account under the name of the Defendant C without any legal cause, in response to the fact that Defendant C gains a profit equivalent to the remittance amount and incurred a loss equivalent to the same amount to the Plaintiff; (b) the Defendant C is obligated to return the remittance amount to the Plaintiff as unjust enrichment; (c) the legal relationship between the remitter and the payee as the cause of the account transfer between the remitter and the payee.

arrow