logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.12.20 2013고정970
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2013 High 1624" was forced to reside in 608 Do-dong 1405, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, and was living in the apartment complex.

On May 2, 2013, at around 22:30, the Defendant, on the street of the above apartment 608-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong (59 years of age, female-do-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu (hereinafter referred to as “Cropty-dong-dong

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Application of the statutes governing the case-related photographs

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Parts of the offense under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the provisional payment order;

1. From 1996, the Defendant: (a) liveded in the 6-party C building in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, a public rental apartment; (b) from May 2010, the Defendant filed a lawsuit for the delivery of the building by delinquency in paying the rent and management expenses for the apartment; and (c) on July 20, 2012, the Defendant went out from the said apartment by compulsory execution based on the judgment of the said lawsuit.

From July 20 to July 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) had no place to live in the said sub-park, which had been subject to compulsory execution at the 608 previous sub-parks, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si; (b) had been living in the said sub-park against the will of the victim F, who is the head of the apartment management office, and interfered with the maintenance, repair, and safety management of the victim’s apartment common area.

2. According to the evidence submitted by the lower prosecutor, the Defendant was on July 20, 2012.

arrow