A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 20, 2018, at around C, the Defendant: (a) reported that the Defendant did not pay the drinking value; and (b) instructed the Defendant to take a bath at the patrol vehicle in order to hold the horses “to pay the drinking value and to return home” from E in the circumstances belonging to the Jeju Police Station D District Unit of the Jeju Police Station, which called the Defendant, at around 04:20 on February 20, 2018; (c) interfered with this, the Defendant used the E’s chest at one time in his/her hands; and (d) assaulted him/her as he/she did with the face.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling List;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (the execution of a sentence shall be suspended in consideration of the fact that there is a high possibility of criticism in that the same mistake has been repeated in spite of the past, despite the fact that there is a criminal history of a fine for the same kind of crime in the past, it is against the fact that contingent crimes and

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;