beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment of three years and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment of eight months.
However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2013 High 306] Defendant A is a person in charge of the design of the board that has a device for the management of the transmission, etc. with electric current, including, but not limited to, the electric and electronic business division, the power distribution team design division, the vessel design division, and the vice head of the vessel, such as the deep sea drilling line, entering the vessel, such as the drone, etc., a power distribution team, an over-electric current protection device, and an instrument.
1. The Defendant A received property in breach of trust from the H representative I in early 2009, upon receiving an unlawful solicitation from the I operating the power distribution team H to the effect that “it shall reflect in the design so that our company may easily supply the blocking machine of the EB (AB) that it imports and supplies, and different rates of supply are set at a higher rate.” The case will give KRW 100 million per each group of the above cases. The Defendant A responded to the above request and received KRW 100,000 from the above I in a mutual influent restaurant around June 2009, from that time to October 23, 2013, and received KRW 100,000 from the above I in total as shown in the attached list of crimes from the I to October 23, 2013.”
As a result, Defendant A acquired KRW 1 billion in receipt of an illegal solicitation in relation to his duties.
2. On June 2012, Defendant A received 10,000,000 won from K to October 22, 2013, as indicated in the attached Table of Crimes (M) from HK, in response to an illegal solicitation to the effect that “I would not have the estimated value of the power distribution team entering the vessel, such as drone, and would not have the estimated value of the distribution team entering the vessel, while designing the vessel, and would have the case of dismissal as our demand.” On July 16, 2012, Defendant A received KRW 10,000 from K to the Agricultural Cooperative (M) account in the name of L used by Defendant A, and received KRW 52,650,000 from K from that time to October 22, 2013, as described in the attached Table of Crimes (2).
In this respect.