1. Defendant A

(a) The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year;

B. On June 24, 2016, among the facts charged in the instant case.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative of the F F, who is a water leisure business entity (ju), and Defendant B is the representative of the underwater construction business entity (ju)G and underwater photographing business entity H.

Defendant

A In around 2009, around Busan Shipping Daegu I performed the J mooring Construction as part of the maritime convention, video, and marine leisure special zone project.

On March 2012, when the construction was in progress, waste, such as large-scale imprisoned concrete, was discharged into water due to the collapse of a construction site around March 2012, and the said waste was left left alone at the lower part of the International moorings.

1. On June 1, 2016, the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport issued an order to remove wastes to Defendant A on or around February 2016, by informing that the wastes were left abandoned through the Busan MBC broadcast, and issued a corrective order again on May 2016.

Accordingly, Defendant A conspired with Defendant B, who operates a underwater construction company, prepared documents as if all were removed from the waste treatment without disposing of the waste and submitted them to the administrative office.

Defendant

A around May 9, 2016, around May 2016, Defendant B entered into a facility construction contract with Defendant B to the effect that “this is only a formal procedure, and only a part of the remainder is treated as it is,” and that Defendant B treated only a part of the wastes left in the first water.

Defendant

B accepted the proposal of Defendant A as above, Defendant A accepted the said proposal and allowed potential potential for sericultural investigation to treat only a part of the wastes by inserting a small concrete sculpture into sludge, and prepared a report on the result of the collection work as if the entire wastes were disposed of.

As such, the Defendants’ facts are as follows: (a) only a part of the facts charged, such as concrete neglected on the lower part of the said moorings, is “ extremely” but are “ extremely” parts of the facts charged.