The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. As to the insult of the facts charged in the instant case, the lower court sentenced the dismissal of prosecution, interference with duties, and damage to property, respectively, and the Defendant filed an appeal only for the convicted portion.

Therefore, since the dismissal part of the judgment of the court below is separated and confirmed as the parties did not appeal, the scope of this court's judgment is limited to the conviction part of the judgment below.

2. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the penalty (1.5 million won of a fine) imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. The judgment of the court below is against all the defendant's wrong facts, and there is no record of being punished for the same crime as the crime of this case, or of being sentenced to heavy punishment exceeding the fine, the wife and children should be supported, and living conditions seems to be very difficult. The court below expressed the defendant's intent that the above victim would not want the punishment of this case by mutual consent with the victim H of the crime of causing property damage in this case. However, each crime of this case was committed by the defendant on the ground that each crime of this case was committed by the defendant, on the date and time stated in the crime of this case in the judgment of the court below, and at the place where the crime of this case was recorded in the judgment of the court below, on the ground that the defendant was committed with the co-defendant B, and the victim C would be compensated for it for about 30 minutes, thereby hindering the operation of the victim C dan bar with the co-defendant B, obstructing the defendant's operation of the crime of this case's 2100,000 won following the defendant's occupation and circumstances, etc.