logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.16 2016가합561399
상표권침해금지 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendants:

(a)an advertisement of the marks listed in the separate sheet or marks, or their packaging, labels, or advertisements;

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a trademark right holder of the registered trademark, as a company established on September 16, 1992 for the purpose of the sediment manufacture and sales business.

(A) As to the registered trademark Nos. 1, 2, and 3 below, the Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer under his own name on May 19, 193, and directly filed an application for the registered trademark No. 4 of the table below and completed the registration; hereinafter “instant registered trademark”). The filing date of the mark / the registration date / the scheduled date of expiration of the designated goods as of October 29, 1982 / the scheduled date of expiration of the designated goods as of June 7, 1983 / 091455, t lease, etc. on June 7, 2023, 1985 / April 3, 208, 1986 / 01250 /4.208 /4.5 19.48/6.5 1984/198, May 38, 1984;

Defendant MFS Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant MFS”) imports and sells the leased products produced by the Company established on March 17, 2014 for the purpose of household wholesale and retail business, household export and import business. The products are accompanied by a separate mark or a separate mark in the separate sheet named “Simon”, “SIMNS”, or “BEAUYRES”.

(hereinafter “U.S. S. S. S. S. S Smonmon mark”). Defendant A, while engaging in household sales business under the trade name “D”, is supplied and sold with a set-lease mark attached to Defendant MFS. C and D.

Defendant B, while running a furniture sales business with the trade name “F” on the building E and the second floor, was supplied and sold by Defendant MFS products with the U.S. trialmon mark attached thereto.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1- 18, or the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the claim for prohibition and destruction due to infringement of the Plaintiff’s trademark right

A. The facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim.

arrow