logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.12.13 2018고단76
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From January 11, 2016 to February 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) from around January 11, 2016 to around February 14, 2016, the Defendant employed the victim of pro-Japanese appearance D in “C” to the victim of pro-Japanese appearance “F in the Republic of Korea Kim Sea E.”

From this end, it is necessary to pay money to the public in an urgent manner at the present moment when he/she has received a monthly wage.

D. The loan will be repaid immediately after three months if D.S. lends the loan.

4. It is expected that the loan will be repaid immediately by receiving the loan in the name of the company in three months after the loan will be paid if the company for which the four-month insurance is applied.

“A false representation was made.”

However, at the time, the Defendant was liable for the amount of KRW 40 million to the lending company and the lender. Since around 2015, the Defendant took up gambling from around 2015, and was thought to use the money borrowed from the damaged party as money for gambling, so there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed money from the damaged party.

Defendant deceiving the victim as above and was transferred KRW 8,500,000, around January 14, 2016, to the new bank account (Account Number: G) opened in the name of the Defendant from the victim, and KRW 25,000, around January 24, 2016, around 300,000, around February 11, 2016, and KRW 842,00, total amount of KRW 9,67,000, around February 14, 2016.

2. From April 22, 2016 to September 9, 2016, the criminal defendant retired from his/her company at the place where it is impossible to know about April 2016.

There are eight million won of the loan that the loan has been received, and the loan has to be repaid and the loan has to be repaid.

Then, the term “a loan of KRW 8 million is changed.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed the money from the damaged person, such as the statement in paragraph 1.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby his deceivings the victim, to the above new bank account in the name of the defendant from the damaged person, KRW 6,930,00 on April 22, 2016, KRW 500,000 on April 28, 2016, and the Nong Bank account in the name of the defendant (Account Number:

arrow