The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On June 12, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and fines of 2,500,000 won for night building theft, etc. in the main branch of the Chuncheon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 20, 2017.

[2] On March 5, 2017, around 08:20, the Defendant discovered rice lids stored by the victim E in front of the D cafeteria CDadong 48 at Won-si, Seoul, and opened a lid without a locking device, and stolen rice lids (8 km) with the market price of KRW 25,000 at the victim’s own market price of KRW 25,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Investigation report (verification of CCTVs at the market prosperity);

1. Previous convictions: Inquiry about criminal history, investigation report (report on the result of confirmation of previous convictions on disposition), screen of search output of Supreme Court case, application of the text of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The latter part of Article 39(1) of the Exempted Criminal Act (the latter part of the Criminal Act, in light of the fact that the defendant is led to and against the crime, the damage to the theft of this case is minor, the defendant's age, environment, sex, criminal records, the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the form and degree of the crime of this case, etc., even if he/she was tried with the first head's night structure intrusion larceny, etc. at which the judgment became final and conclusive, it seems that he/she was not subject to more severe punishment even if he/she was tried with the crime of this case and the above crime for which the judgment became final and conclusive, in consideration of equity in cases where he/she