logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.10.20 2016고단660
폭행
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for four months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 23, 2016, Defendant A assaulted the victim’s face face at a time of drinking, on the ground that the victim B(50 years of age) in the underground shopping district located in Chuncheon City was going to work and going to work by the Defendant before G, and Defendant A assaulted the victim’s face at a time of drinking.

2. Defendant B was assaulted from the victim A (the age of 64) at the time, at the same time, and at the place mentioned in the preceding paragraph, and as seen above, the victim’s body part was frighted by drinking alone and walked several times to walked the victim’s face part, thereby requiring approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim. In addition, the Defendant 2 dump dump dump, sump, sump, sump, and sump s

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. A ct v image reproduction cd-up and a photograph by capturing a video;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Selection of fines;

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of the provisional payment order: Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Defendant A

(a) The scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines (the scope of recommendations) shall be limited to the basic area (two months to ten months) of the crimes of assault (general assault).

B. The Defendant, who was sentenced to sentence, exercised violence first to B, became fighting one another, and the Defendant was not aware of having been subject to a large number of criminal punishment due to violence, etc. from 1975 to 2013, and committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that there was no specific attitude of reflectivity as to the instant crime, as well as the age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., indicated in the arguments in the instant case.

arrow